there's this little dilemma

Thursday, August 07, 2008

ok first, before i start off on my rant about my "dilemma", i gotta say this - felicia's absolutely right omg. i'm having quarter-life crisis!!!

ok end of amazing-discovery plug. -_-

now, on my dilemma. so here's the thing. i'm not too sure if i should report this issue, or do something about it. it'll affect people who don't want to be affected. i'm pretty sure most people are happy clappy with the way things are going now.

i have this thing against a particular lecturer of mine. not that all lecturers in my uni aren't good. in fact, to be honest, here's the breakdown - some lecturers are hardly passable, some are decent enough, a handful are very good. however, there are one or two lecturers that really do not deserve much respect.

the worst lecturer on my list (up until last sem) was this guy who gave really awesome tips for exams. his exams were all mcqs, and for finals, there were about 50 mcqs if i remember correctly. so when he gave us tips, i was rather, um, pleasantly surprised that he gave tips for all questions. yah, 50 tips. and really la, not like he really needed to give tips cos most of his exam questions were quite... well, "easy" would be a politer term. i rather felt that the exam insulted our intelligence. the mcqs were riddled with absurdly ridiculous answer options, i vaguely remember wanting to smash my head onto the table during the exam, due to the sheer stupidity of some of the answer choices given.

though to be fair, it's not that the lecturer couldn't teach (and not that he was axcellent at it anyway la). just that, well, i had this guy for my first sem, and mainly because of him, i got the impression that my course is damn low quality.

well, subsequent semesters weren't that bad - i came across good lecturers as well, of course. particularly during my previous semester, where i had competent lecturers who were able to deliver.

and then there is this amazing lecturer this semester -_-

he's not stupid, really. in fact, he gives me the impression that he knows stuff. the first class of his that i attended, he remarked that he graded students according to his "mood". if he's in a good mood for that semester, more students will get A. unfortunately, he's pms-ing not in a good mood this semester, hence less people will score an A.

i couldn't help but raise my eyebrows at his words. but oh well, there are lecturers like these, nothing new, i'll let it slide.

so this lecturer mentioned before that experience is more important than academics, or something to that effect. i suppose exams aren't important to him. so what does he do? since exams are wayyy to hyped up and emphasised, maybe that's why he decided we don't need to do our first test. but i have a feeling ISO makes it wajib that we students have first tests for every subject. so how now lembu perang?

he decides that we'll get our "test scores" by lucky draw.

and the students agreed anyway, cos it's a win-win situation! no need to study and take first test, less hassle, more time for other subjects. and lowest score you'll get from the lucky draw is 16, with full marks being 20. so hey, why not? and this lecturer's been doing it previous semesters anyway.

... but honestly, lucky draw? how can one not be incredulous?

and, well that has got me wondering if i am gonna report this. but i'm sure many students won't exactly be jumping for joy if we now have to sit for a test, should the authorities decide to amend this matter.

(but we're STUDENTS and we're not here in uni to do stuff like LUCKY DRAW your exam marks RIGHT. OMG WTF LA DAMN STUPID.)

also, the lecturer has a... pretty creative mind. who knows what he might do to spite the students, if i do report him. i think some, if not many students here value their A's in different ways than i do.

... or am i being too uptight about this whole thing? am i some sort of conformist? but really, if he decided to grade us based on other stuff rather than exams, e.g. a debate or something constructive, i wouldn't have minded. in fact, that would work better for some subjects, rather than exams.

and i'll stop here, abruptly, as i'm feeling hungry and my friends are waiting for me.

kthxbai.

5 tortoises in a row!:

Anonymous said...

This city deserves a better class of criminal... I mean lecturer.

But seriously man. At uni level? That's ridiculous. If it gets out, University Pertanian was it? (kekeke) will be the laughing stock of the country. Don't tell me the other unis are worse. And Malaysia will be the laughing stock of Asia and the world. Nothing new.

Do they really think that all their students have the brains of farmers? C'mon man! This is the 21st Century. Even farmers are smart!

How r u btw? =D

ьем said...

Are.you.kidding.me. -__- Lucky draw? Amazing...

sherry said...

step: EH it's PUTRA not pertanian! =p dunno why i'm so gung-ho defending the name, wth. i'm still feeling really incredulous over this whole thing.

oh, and i'm doing pretty ok =) heard from jing that u'll be back for a bit during september! weh faster come back =D


ck*: aih, not kidding lor. i wouldnt have believed it if i weren't caught in the situation itself. -_-

Felicia said...

what? you spent your time typing this while we were (kononnya) waiting for you? LOL anyway we all know how that turned out ><

I'm still incredulous to tell the truth, that at UNI level, this is just.. absurd. Like ABSURD. BUT, we all know the politics. IF you feel you can let this slide, then let it slide. If not, just report it. As a student, you have the right to say something about this.

sherry said...

felicia: heh no la, i typed this in my faculty's comp lab. u prolly got the wrong thursday.

and. sigh. i might just let it slide, but it's the "tidak apa" attitude taking over me. nooO.